πŸ”
Comparison Β· Metaprotocols

Ordinals vs Runes vs BRC-20: what's the difference?

Three names that get used interchangeably β€” wrongly. They solve different problems. Here is the plain-English breakdown of what each one is, how it stores data, and which fits which use case.

ComparisonRunesOrdinals

The one-sentence version

Ordinals/inscriptions attach data to individual sats (think collectibles). BRC-20 was the first attempt at fungible tokens, built on top of inscriptions using text. Runes is a purpose-built fungible-token protocol that uses Bitcoin's UTXO model far more efficiently.

Side by side

 Ordinals / inscriptionsBRC-20Runes
Best forNon-fungible content (art, collectibles)Fungible tokens (early/experimental)Fungible tokens (efficient)
How it stores stateData inscribed onto a satoshiJSON text inscriptions interpreted by clientsBalances encoded in UTXOs via OP_RETURN
UTXO efficiencyn/a (single asset)Low β€” tends to create clutterHigh β€” designed for it
LaunchedInscriptions concept, 20232023, atop Ordinals2024, by Ordinals' creator
Needs a sidechain/bridge?NoNoNo

Which should you care about?

For the underlying mechanics, see the Ordinals & Runes pillar, the Runes deep-dive, and the Ordinals market analysis. Ready to try it? Follow how to mint an Ordinal or how to launch a Rune.

Whichever you explore, the same safety rule holds: legitimate mints never need your seed phrase, and you should never connect your wallet to an unverified site.

Bitcoin Penguins is an independent research publication β€” not a token. Educational content only; nothing here is financial advice. Always DYOR.

Educational content only. Not financial advice.